In early August, the Justice Department closed its investigation into former Rep. Tom Feeney, R-Fla. This development wasn’t just newsworthy because Feeney lost re-election — partly due to the cloud of investigation. It also came just weeks after a Washington, D.C., appellate court held that Feeney’s statements to the House Ethics Committee were protected by the “Speech or Debate” privilege.
The Feeney decision illustrates why last summer may go down as a seminal season for Speech or Debate jurisprudence. Courts in several jurisdictions actively reviewed the parameters of this arcane constitutional privilege.
Browse Timeline
- « Insightful article by Al Kamen in Friday’s Post on FARA
- » The Politics of Investing for Members of Congress
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.